AKREDITASI PUSKESMAS SEBAGAI INTERVENING PENGARUH KUALITAS PELAYANAN TERHADAP KEPUASAN PASIEN
Keywords:accreditation, patient satisfaction, service quality, puskesmas
Background: The role of puskesmas as the spearhead of basic health services with broad assessment is very important to optimize. Quality as a barometer of service must be put forward so that it becomes a culture aimed at patient satisfaction. Objective: to analyze the influence of puskesmas accreditation status in mediating the effect of quality on the satisfaction of puskesmas patients in Denpasar. Methods: The subjects of the study were the puskesmas patients in Denpasar City, while the objects in this study were quality of service, accreditation status, patient satisfaction. Samples were taken randomly using cluster random sampling, which was taken to take representative samples in each district. The taking in the field is done by purposive sampling. Data consisted of patient responses obtained by giving instruments. Data analysis was performed using Path Analysis. Results: Z scores for “Utama” and ‘Paripurna” status accreditation are 1.9601 and 2.7053, respectively. Both values are greater than 1.96 which means the accreditation status is able to mediate the relationship between Service Quality and Patient Satisfaction Coclusion: Service quality could impact patient satisfaction positively and significant where puskesmas accreditation is able to mediate the relationship between service quality and patient satisfaction at the Denpasar City Health Center.
Menteri Kesehatan RI. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia No. 46 Tahun 2015 tentang Akreditasi Puskesmas, Klinik Pratama, Tempat Praktik Mandiri Dokter, dan Tempat Praktik Mandiri Dokter Gigi. Diakses dari www.depkes.go.id [Diakses tanggal 27 Agustus 2018]
Sack C, Scherag A, Lutkes P, Gunther W, Jockel KH, Holtmann G. Is there an association between hospital accreditation and patient satisfaction with hospital care? A survey of 37,000 patients treated by 73 hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care 2011; 23:278-83. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr011
Pohan, Imbalo.(2007).Jaminan Mutu Layanan Kesehatan : Dasar-Dasar Pengertian Dan Penerapan. Jakarta: EGC
Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2008; 20: 172-83. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn005
Jovanovic B. Hospital Accreditation as Method for Assessing Quality in Healthcare. Arch Oncol 2005; 13: 156-7.
Direktorat Jendral Bina Upaya Kesehatan. 2013.Akreditasi Puskesmas. Jakarta.
Heuer AJ. Hospital Accreditation and Patient Satisfaction: Testing the Relationship. J Healthc Qual 2004; 26: 46-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2004.tb00471.x
Hayati NI, Azimatun NA, Rozita H, Ezat WA, Rizal AM. InPatients’ Satisfaction In The Medical And Surgical Wards – A Comparison Between Accredited And Non Accredited Hospital In The State Of Selangor. J Commun Health 2010; 16: 60-8.
Nursalam. (2011). Manajemen Keperawatan.edisi 3. Jakarta : Salemba Medika
Kotler, dan Keller. (2012). Manajemen Pemasaran. Edisi 12. Jakarta: Erlangga
Zeithaml, V.A., M.J. Bitner, D.D. Gremler. 2013. Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm 6 th ed. Mc.Graw-Hill
Tjiptono Fandy, 2014, Pemasaran Jasa, Andi, Yogyakarta
Zikmund, W.G., Babin, J., Carr, J. & Griffin, M. (2012) “Business Research Methods: with Qualtrics Printed Access Card” Cengage Learning.
Iacobucci, Dawn. 2012. Mediation analysis and categorical variables: The ﬁnal frontier. Journal of Consumer Psychology 22 (2012) 582–594. Elsevier.
Baron, Reuben M., & Kenny, David A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182
Sabarguna BS. 2009. Manajemen Rumah Sakit. Jakarta: Sagung Seto
Copyright (c) 2020 Gde Palguna Reganata, Made Karma Maha Wirajaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.