Perbedaan Upaya Mitigasi Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari Lama Masa Tinggal Di Daerah Terdampak Kabut Asap Riau

  • Nurul Aiyuda Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Abdurrab

Abstract

Mitigasi merupakan upaya untuk mengurangi dampak kabut asap. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji perbedaan upaya mitigasi dampak asap di Riau ditinjau dari lama masa tinggal. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah 201 individu yang terkena dampak kabut asap, yang diambil menggunakan purposive sampling di wilayah Pekanbaru. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan skala mitigasi sementara untuk masa tinggal yang dibedakan dengan rentang 5 tahun pertama hingga lebih dari 15 tahun. Melalui analisis Anova, ditemukan adanya perbedaan upaya mitigasi ditinjau dari lama masa tinggal dengan signifikansi 0,006 (F: 4,328). Dengan demikian, kecenderungan masyarakat terdampak untuk mengupayakan mitigasi dapat dibedakan berdasarkan masa tinggal. Dalam penelitian ini, semakin lama masa tinggal di daerah dampak kabut asap, maka semakin tinggi upaya mitigasi yang dilakukan.

References

Aiyuda, N., & Koentjoro. (2017). Hubungan antara Persepsi Risiko dan Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terdampak terhadap Otoritas dalam Upaya Mitigasi Dampak Kabut Asap Riau. Gadjah Mada Journal Of Psychology, 2(2), 101–112. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamajop/article/download/33094/19976.

Benson, C., Twigg, J., & Rossetto, T. (2007). Perangkat untuk mengarusutamakan pengurangan risiko bencana : Catatan panduan bagi Lembaga-lembaga yang bergerak dalam bidang pembangunan (CIRCLE Indonesia, Terjemahan). (T. Wuryantari, Ed.). Yogjakarta: Hivos Kantor Regional Asia Tenggara dan CIRCLE Indonesia. (di cetak ulang dari Tool for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction : Guidancce notes fo development organisations,2007, Switzerland : the ProVention Consortium).

BNPB. (2013). Ketangguhan bangsa dalam menghadapi bencana. Gema BNPB, 4(2).
Retrieved from https://www.bnpb.go.id/uploads/migration/pubs/587.pdf.

Brenkert-smith, H., Champ, P. A., & Flores, N. (2012). Trying not to get burned: Understanding homeowners’ wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors. Environmental Management, 50(6), 1139–1151. doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9949-8.

Brenkert-smith, H., Champ, P. A., & Telligman, A. L. (2013). Understanding change : Wildfire in Larimer country, Colorado. Res. Note RMRS-RN-58. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 46 p.

Brenkert-Smith, H., Champ, P. A., & Telligman, A. L. (2013). Understanding change : Wildfire in Boulder country, Colorado. Res. Note RMRS-RN-57. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 46 p.

Chaiken, S., & Ledgerwood, A. (2012). A theory of heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology-Volume 2 (pp. 246– 265). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Champ, P. A., Brenkert-smith, H., & Flores, N. (2011a). Living with wIldfire in Boulder country, Colorado, 2007. Res. Note RMRS-RN-47WWW. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 26 p.

Champ, P. A., Brenkert-smith, H., & Flores, N. (2011b). Living with wildfire in Larimer county, Colorado, 2007. Res. Note RMRS-RN-48WWW. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 27 p.

De Dominicis, S., Crano, W. D., Cancellieri, G. U., Mosco, B., Bonnes, M., Hohman, Z., et al. (2014). Vested interest and environmental risk communication: Improving willingness to cope with impending disasters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(5), 364-374.

Dickinson, K., Brenkert-smith, H., & Flores, N. (2015). Catching fire? social interactions, beliefs, and wildfire risk mitigation behaviors. Society and Natural Resources, 28, 807–824. doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1037034.

Faisal, F., Yunus, F., & Harahap, F. (2012). Dampak asap kebakaran hutan pada pernapasan. CDK-189, 39(1), 31–35. Retrieved from http://www.kalbemed.com/Portals/6/10_189Dampak Asap Kebakaran Hutan pada Pernapasan.pdf.

Ferguson, M. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). The effect of intergroup comparison on willingness to perform sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 275–281. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.04.001.

Ho, M., Shaw, D., Lin, S., & Chiu, Y. (2008). How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? Risk Analysis, 28(3), 635–643. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539- 6924.2008.01040.x.

ISDR. (2008). Climate Change and Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Retrieved from http://www.unisdr.org/files/4146_ClimateChangeDRR.pdf.

Lin, S., & Shaw, Æ. D. (2008). Why are flood and landslide victims less willing to take mitigation measures than the public ? Nat Hazards, 44, 305–314. doi.org/10.1007/s11069-007-9136-z.

Martin, I. M., Bender, H., & Raish, C. (2007). What motivates individuals to protect themselves from risks: The case of wildland fires. Risk Analysis, 27(4), 887–900. doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00930.x.

Martin, W. E., Martin, I. M., & Kent, B. (2009). The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: The case of wildfire in high risk communities. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(2), 489–498. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.007.

Maulana, D. S., Toha, M., Widyanto, S. “Gendon,” Sofyan, & Wibowo, T. E. (2007). Berkawan dengan ancaman strategi dan adaptasi reduksi bencana (Kedua). Jakarta: Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (WALHI).

McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Personal experience and the “psychological distance” of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 109–118.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.003.

Notebaert, L., Masschelein, S., Wright, B., & Macleod, C. (2015). To risk or not to risk : Anxiety and the calibration between risk perception and danger mitigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 0–11. doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000210.supp.

Renn, O. (2004). Perception of risks. Toxicology Letter, 149, 405–413. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.051.

Renn, O., & Rohrmann, B. (Eds.). (2000). Cross-Cultural risk perception : A survey of empirical studies. Stuttgart and Melbourne: Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V.

Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. (R. E. Lofstedt, Ed.). UK and USA: Taylor & Francis.

Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Sarah. (1982). Why study risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2(2).

Spence, a., Poortinga, W., Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience [Letter]. Nature Climate Change, 1(4), 46–49. doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059.

Wei, J., Zhu, W., Marinova, D., & Wang, F. (2016). Household adoption of smog protective behavior: a comparison between two Chinese cities. Journal of Risk Research, 9877(March), 1–22. doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1121904.
Published
2018-08-09
How to Cite
AIYUDA, Nurul. Perbedaan Upaya Mitigasi Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari Lama Masa Tinggal Di Daerah Terdampak Kabut Asap Riau. Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Call For Paper Peranan Psikologi Bencana Dalam Mengurangi Risiko Bencana, [S.l.], p. 131-139, aug. 2018. Available at: <http://ejournal.unbi.ac.id/index.php/semnaspsikologibencana/article/view/71>. Date accessed: 12 july 2020.